Evidence and provenance
Source policy
A citation is useful only when it supports the nearby claim and readers can understand what kind of source it is. Archeora records that relationship instead of adding decorative reference lists.
Source selection
Primary research, academic reviews and institutional material are preferred for scientific or historical claims. Responsible editorial and reference sources may document language, culture or current search context, but they do not receive the authority of clinical evidence. Commercial popularity never determines factual weight.
Claim-level mapping
Each evidence record names the source, publisher, source type, language, confidence, review state, checked date and the claims it supports. Jung texts are distinguished from modern Jung-inspired commentary. Unsupported universal meanings, forecasts and medical conclusions are excluded rather than softened with a citation.
Freshness and replacement
Sources carry a next-review date and are checked by a scheduled reachability monitor. A dead, materially changed or contradicted source is marked for review or replacement; an archive may preserve historical context but does not make a weak claim reliable. Material evidence changes trigger content review.